[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
publication ethics::
Abstracting and Indexing::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations77
h-index11
i10-index00
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 1 (1-2025) ::
cofs 2025, 3(1): 15-24 Back to browse issues page
Microleakage Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Custom-Made Cast Post-and-Core Using Two Types of Cement and Two Types of Roots Canal Irrigants
Elham Alipour , Masomeh Rostamzadeh * , Rashid Ramazanzadeh , Bijan Nouri , Parham Asadi
Faculty of Dentistry, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract:   (184 Views)
Background: To retain endodontically treated teeth, a post and core crown is necessary. The process of creating space for the post removes a significant amount of root canal filling, increasing the risk of microleakage. This study compares microleakage in treated teeth restored with cast post and cores using two different cements and irrigants.
Materials & Methods:  This experimental study investigated the effects of different cement and irrigant combinations on cloudiness caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Six groups, each with eight maxillary central teeth, were examined. Groups 1 and 2 used glass ionomer (GI) cement and Panavia resin cement, respectively, with EDTA as the irrigant. Groups 3 and 4 used the same cements with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Group 5 was the positive control, while group 6 was the negative control. Samples were placed in sterilized Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) and injected with E. faecalis every three days for 60 days. The occurrence of cloudiness was recorded and analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).
Results. The results showed no significant difference in microleakage between the cements and irrigants. The interaction between cements and irrigants in the four groups was not significant in the degree of microleakage (P>0.05) Group 5 samples became cloudy within three days, whereas Group 6 samples remained clear throughout the study.
Conclusion: None of the cements and irrigants provided a complete coronal seal. However, GI cement showed less microleakage than Panavia resin cement. NaOCl showed less microleakage than EDTA. However, the differences were not significant in cements and irrigants.
 
Keywords: Microleakage, Dental Cements, Root Canal Irrigants, Smear Layer.
Full-Text [PDF 469 kb]   (68 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2024/09/1 | Accepted: 2025/02/1 | Published: 2025/03/5
References
1. Shillingburg HT, Sather DA. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence, 2012
2. Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Factors that affect the outcomes of root canal treatment and retreatment-A reframing of the principles. Int Endod J. 2023;56 Suppl 2:82-115. [DOI:10.1111/iej.13897] [PMID]
3. Penha da Silva PJ, Marceliano-Alves MF, Provenzano JC, Dellazari RLA, Gonçalves LS, Alves FRF. Quality of Root Canal Filling Using a Bioceramic Sealer in Oval Canals: A Three-Dimensional Analysis. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(3):475-480 [DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722095] [PMID] []
4. Kersten HW, Moorer WR. Particles and molecules in endodontic leakage. Int Endod J. 1989;22(3):118-124. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00909.x] [PMID]
5. Jokstad A. Secondary caries and microleakage. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):11-25 [DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.006] [PMID]
6. Jhajharia K. Microbiology of endodontic diseases: A review article. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences 2019; 5(1): 227-230
7. Mannocci F, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Sealing ability of several restorative materials used for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod. 1997;23(10):639-641. [DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80178-1] [PMID]
8. Torabinejad M, Fouad AF, Shabahang SH. Endodontics principles and practice. 6th ed. London: Elsevier, 2021.
9. Wu MK, Pehlivan Y, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(3):264-269 [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70235-5] [PMID]
10. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):280-301 [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3] [PMID]
11. Piemjai M, Miyasaka K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(6):598-603 [DOI:10.1067/mpr.2002.129383] [PMID]
12. Dias LL, Giovani AR, Silva Sousa YT, et al. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):579-583 [DOI:10.1590/S1678-77572009000600008] [PMID] []
13. Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation. J Prosthodont. 2002;11(3):168-175. https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2002.127619 [DOI:10.1053/jpro.2002.127619] [PMID]
14. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(4):375-380. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90028-1] [PMID]
15. Allen EP, Bayne SC, Donovan TE, Hansson TL, Klooster J, Kois JC. Annual review of selected dental literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(1):56-93. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90347-9] [PMID]
16. Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod. 1998;24(11):703-708. [DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80157-X] [PMID]
17. O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26(12):739-743. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200012000-00019] [PMID]
18. Ma HM, Li ZC, Li H, Chen X. The effect of different fabrication methods and luting cements on post retention. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004;22(2):152-154.
19. Pommel L, Camps J. Effects of pressure and measurement time on the fluid filtration method in endodontics. J Endod. 2001;27(4):256-258. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200104000-00003] [PMID]
20. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Lima KC. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5%, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2000;26(6):331-334. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200006000-00006] [PMID]
21. Ergin S, Gemalmaz D. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(5):491-497. [DOI:10.1067/mpr.2002.129090] [PMID]
22. Ricucci D, Gröndahl K, Bergenholtz G. Periapical status of root-filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90(3):354-359. [DOI:10.1067/moe.2000.108802] [PMID]
23. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10(3):105-108. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1994.tb00533.x] [PMID]
24. Jung SH, Min KS, Chang HS, Park SD, Kwon SN, Bae JM. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(4):270-276. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60100-0] [PMID]
25. Fox K, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root-canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J. 1997;30(6):361-368. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00093.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00726.x] [PMID]
26. Fernandes FC, Alvarez-Leite ME, Jansen WC, Seraidarian PL, Horter MC, Nunes E, et al. Analysis of bacterial infiltration in cast post cores, cemented with different types of cement. Revista Odonto Ciência. 2015;30(1):7-11. [DOI:10.15448/1980-6523.2015.1.17069]
27. Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, MacKenzie D. The effect of smear layer on microbial coronal leakage of gutta‐percha root fillings. International Endodontic Journal. 1996;29(4):242-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01376.x] [PMID]
28. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5721-5732. [DOI:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005] [PMID] []
29. DeSchepper EJ, White RR, von der Lehr W. Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers. Am J Dent. 1989;2(2):51-56.
30. Irie M, Suzuki K. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 1999;24(5):272-278.
31. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975;1(7):238-242. [DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3] [PMID]
32. Chailertvanitkul P, Saunders WP, MacKenzie D. The effect of smear layer on microbial coronal leakage of gutta-percha root fillings. Int Endod J. 1996;29(4):242-248. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01376.x] [PMID]
33. Timpawat S, Vongsavan N, Messer HH. Effect of removal of the smear layer on apical microleakage. J Endod. 2001;27(5):351-353. [DOI:10.1097/00004770-200105000-00011] [PMID]
34. Gençoğlu N, Samani S, Günday M. Dentinal wall adaptation of thermoplasticized gutta-percha in the absence or presence of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 1993;19(11):558-562. [DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81286-0] [PMID]
35. Behrend GD, Cutler CW, Gutmann JL. An in-vitro study of smear layer removal and microbial leakage along root-canal fillings. Int Endod J. 1996;29(2):99-107. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01169.x] [PMID]
36. Clark-Holke D, Drake D, Walton R, Rivera E, Guthmiller JM. Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. J Dent. 2003;31(4):275-281. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00032-0] [PMID]
37. Miraki Z, Rostamzadeh M, Feizi A, Shokri A, Rasouli MA. Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of general dentists and specialists about the application of different dental cements. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2023; 26 (5) :31-38
38. Rostamzadeh M, Sangdehi SA, Salimizand H, Nouri B, Rahimi F. Evaluating the anti-Candida effects of selenium nanoparticles impregnated in acrylic resins: An in vitro study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024;18(4):258-263 [DOI:10.34172/joddd.41113] [PMID] []
39. Ganji K, Rostamzadeh M, Talimkhani I, Moradi Y. The comparison of survival rates between narrow diameter implants and Standard Diameter Implants: an updated Meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023;37:5. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.37.5] [PMID] []
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML     Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alipour E, Rostamzadeh M, Ramazanzadeh R, Nouri B, Asadi P. Microleakage Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Custom-Made Cast Post-and-Core Using Two Types of Cement and Two Types of Roots Canal Irrigants. cofs 2025; 3 (1) :15-24
URL: http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/article-1-71-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 1 (1-2025) Back to browse issues page
علوم نوین دهان و صورت contemporary orofacial science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710