[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
publication ethics::
Abstracting and Indexing::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations88
h-index11
i10-index00
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 2 (5-2025) ::
cofs 2025, 3(2): 28-33 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of the Effect of Cement Type on Retention of Fixed Zirconia Restoration
Melika Saadatmand , Meysam Mahabadi * , Shadab Hashemi
Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (215 Views)
Background: The retention of the crown on teeth or abutment of a bridge is one of the important factors in the success of dental treatments, especially when teeth have a short crown. One factor that can affect the retention strength of crowns on such teeth is the type of cement and its relation to the core material. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of cement type on fixed zirconia restorations.
Materials and Methods: 60 samples were prepared in the form of a prepared tooth using a brass rod, with 11 mm length and 7 mm diameter in the margin and 6 mm in the upper part of the sample. The samples were used as an anti-rotation, and then crowns of zirconia were designed and made by CAD/CAM on the samples. Then 60 samples were randomly distributed into three equal groups (n=20) and each group was cemented with one of three luting agents: glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and panavia resin cement. The amount of force required to separate the crowns was measured by the universal testing machine. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA test and Tukey's post hoc test (α= 0.05).
Result: The mean of fixed zirconia restorations in the three groups was significantly different (P <0.001). The mean of fixed zirconia restorations in the zinc phosphate cement group was significantly higher than the Panavia resin cement group (P=0.001) and in the Panavia resin cement group was significantly higher than the glass ionomer cement group (P <0.001).
Conclusion: The use of zinc phosphate cement in comparison to Panavia and glass ionomer provides more retention for zirconia crowns.
Full-Text [PDF 350 kb]   (66 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Oral Medicine
Received: 2024/10/22 | Accepted: 2025/01/26 | Published: 2025/05/20
References
1. Ebadian B, Hatami M. Tooth-supported cantilevered FDPs: a review. Journal of Isfahan Dental School 2010; 6(4): 410-425
2. Shillingburg HT,Sather DA. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence, 2012. P:9
3. Narula S, Punia V, KhaNdelWal M, Sharma V, Pamecha S. Retention in Conventional Fixed Partial Dentures: A Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011; 5: 1128-1133.
4. Madani A, Goharian R, Mohaghegh M. Comparative study of crown retention on composite core by glassionomer luting cement, adhesive resin and zinc phosphate after thermocycling. Journal of Dentistry. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 2006; 30: 125-132
5. Ishikiriama A, Oliveira JF, Viera DF, Mondelli J. Influence of some Factors on the fit of cemented crowns. J prosthet Dent, 1982; (4): 400-404. [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(81)90100-1] [PMID]
6. Rosentiel SF, Gegauff AG. Improving the cementation of complete cast crown:A comparison of static and dynamic seating methods. J Am dent assoc, 1988; 117: 845-8. [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.1988.0137] [PMID]
7. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J prosthetic Dent 2006; 96: 104-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001] [PMID]
8. Tsukakoshi M, Shinya A, Gomi H, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. Effects of dental adhesive cement and surface treatment on bond strength and leakage of zirconium oxide ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):159-71 [DOI:10.4012/dmj.27.159] [PMID]
9. Alves M, Campos F, Bergoli CD, Bottino MA, Ozcan M, Souza R. Effect of adhesive cementation strategies on the bonding of Y-TZP to human dentin. Oper Dent 2016;41(3):276-83 [DOI:10.2341/15-052-L] [PMID]
10. Aleisa KH, Alwazzan KH, Nawaf Al-Dwairi Z, Almoharib H, Alshabib A, Aleid A, et al. Retention of zirconium oxide copings using different types of luting agents. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2013; 8: 392 [DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2013.03.003]
11. Tinschert J, Natt G,Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001; 26(4):367-374
12. Rink S, Huts A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy milled all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont, 1995;8:303-310.
13. Heshmat H, Banava S. Dental cements: which? Where? When? Tehran: mir,2009
14. Opler R, Wadhwani C, Hess T, Pineyro A, Chung KH. Cement Application Techniques in Luting Implant- Supported Crowns: A Quantitative and Qualitative Survey Volume 27. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant, 2012; 27:859-64
15. Shen Ch, Rawls HR, Esquivel-Upshaw JF. Phillips' science of dental materials.13th ed. St. Louis: Saunders,2021
16. Musajo F, Passi P, Girardello GB, Carle PO, Rusca F. Role of tapering angle and cement as retention factors of prosthetic crowns under pressure variation. Int Dent J, 1996; 2:1-7.
17. Oilo G, Jorgensen KD. The influence of surface roughness on the retentive ability of two dental luting cements. J Oral Rehabi, 1978; 5(4): 377-89. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01257.x] [PMID]
18. Nojedehiyan H, Moezzyzadeh M, Valizadeh Haghi H. Effect of Zirconia Substructure Design on the In-Vitro Fracture load of Malar Zirconia Core Crowns. J Dent Sch 2013;30(5):283-292.
19. Parker RM. Use of zirconia in restorative dentistry. Dent Today 2007; 26(3): 114, 116, 119
20. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 2008.
21. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Sep;92(3):265-73 [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027] [PMID]
22. Ernst CP, Aksoy E, Stender E, Willershausen B. Influence of different luting concepts on long term retentive strength of zirconia crowns. Am J Dent. 2009 Apr;22(2):122-8
23. Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials.14th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2019
24. Maroulakos G, Thompson GA, Kontogiorgos ED. Effect of cement type on the clinical performance and complications of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns: A systematic review. Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 May;121(5):754-765 [DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.011] [PMID]
25. Zidan O, Ferguson GC. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent, 2003; 89(6): 565-71. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00182-3] [PMID]
26. Dähne F, Meißner H, Böning K, Arnold C, Gutwald R, Prause E. Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 20;7(1):62. [DOI:10.1186/s40729-021-00349-4] [PMID] []
27. Aziz, A. M., & El-Mowafy, O. (2023). Clinical evaluation of zirconia crowns cemented with two different resin cements: A retrospective study. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 50(12), 1481-1486. [DOI:10.1111/joor.13580] [PMID]
28. Srinivasan SR, Mathew MG, Jayaraman J. Comparison of Three Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth: a 36-month Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2023;45(2):117-124.
29. Jenista JS, Hoopes WL, Knowles JF, Vandewalle KS. Fracture load of zirconia crowns based on preparation and cement type. Gen Dent. 2022;70(5):22-27.
30. Shokry M, Al-Zordk W, Ghazy M. Retention strength of monolithic zirconia crowns cemented with different primer-cement systems. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):187. [DOI:10.1186/s12903-022-02223-0] [PMID] []
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saadatmand M, Mahabadi M, Hashemi S. Evaluation of the Effect of Cement Type on Retention of Fixed Zirconia Restoration. cofs 2025; 3 (2) :28-33
URL: http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/article-1-84-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 2 (5-2025) Back to browse issues page
Contemporary Orofacial Science Contemporary Orofacial Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714