[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
publication ethics::
Abstracting and Indexing::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations77
h-index11
i10-index00
..
:: Volume 2, Issue 1 (1-2024) ::
cofs 2024, 2(1): 1-7 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of flexural strength and surface roughness of temporary crowns made by conventional and digital methods
Mansureh sadat Abtahi , Mehrdad Barekatain * , Mehrdad Kazemian , Fereshteh Shahri
Department of operative dentistry, Faculty of dentistry, Isfahan (khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (203 Views)
Background: Assessment of dental materials do by different methods. The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength and surface roughness of temporary crowns manufactured through conventional and digital methods.
Materials and method: An experimental laboratory study was conducted on 60 rod-shaped samples made from three different materials. These materials were ENA high filler flowable composite, CENTRIX self- curing acrylic base composite and 3D printer resin. To create the 3D printer group samples, the original metal model was scanned and the design file was printed using a 3D printer. For the composite samples and acrylic bases, a silicone index was used, which was composed of the original metal model. Ten samples of each material were stored in artificial saliva for 30 days. The samples were then tested for flexural strength and surface roughness. The data collected was analysed using a one-way analysis of variance, Bonferroni’s post hoc (α =0.05).
Results: The average flexural strength varied significantly among the three materials after being immersed in artificial saliva for a month (p<0.001). The ENA flow material's average flexural strength was significantly higher than the CENTRIX material and printed resin (p<0.001), and the CENTRIX material's average flexural strength was significantly higher than printed resin (p<0.001). The CENTRIX material also had a significantly higher initial roughness mean (Ra) value compared to the ENA flow material (p=0.010) and printed resin (p=0.009), while there was no significant difference between the ENA flow material and printed resin (p=1.00). One month after immersion in artificial saliva, the CENTRIX material's mean surface roughness (Ra) was significantly higher than the ENA flow material (p=0.005) and printed resin (p=0.040).
Conclusion: Flowable composite resin presents better mechanical properties when compared to acrylic base resin and printed resin. The surface roughness of flowable composite and printed resin is lower than acrylic base composite, but the surface roughness of all materials increases when exposed to saliva
Keywords: Dental Restoration, Temporary, Flexural Strength, Composite Resin
Full-Text [PDF 265 kb]   (158 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2023/07/12 | Accepted: 2024/04/30 | Published: 2024/07/10
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abtahi M S, Barekatain M, Kazemian M, Shahri F. Comparison of flexural strength and surface roughness of temporary crowns made by conventional and digital methods. cofs 2024; 2 (1) :1-7
URL: http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/article-1-34-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 1 (1-2024) Back to browse issues page
علوم نوین دهان و صورت contemporary orofacial science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4712