[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
publication ethics::
Abstracting and Indexing::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations1111
h-index22
i10-index00
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 4 (11-2025) ::
cofs 2025, 3(4): 0-0 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Four Types of Artificial Teeth to Acrylic Denture Base Under In Vitro Conditions
Ali Nurmohammadi * , Mojtaba Shahtoosi , Meysam Mahabadi , Elham Delshad
Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (73 Views)
Background: Detachment of artificial teeth from the denture acrylic base is a significant complication among denture users. This study aimed to compare the tensile bond strength of four types of artificial teeth to the acrylic denture base.
Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental study investigated 36  samples of four types of artificial teeth: Ivoclar composite, Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli. Nine maxillary first premolar teeth from each type were selected. Grooves measuring 3 mm in depth and 2 mm in length were created on the occlusal surface of each tooth, and this surface was embedded in self-cure acrylic up to the CEJ level. The smallest cross-sectional area among the samples was selected as the standard, and all specimens were adjusted to match this area. The primary casts were poured, cylindrical wax models were attached to the specimen bases, and flasking was performed. After replacing the wax with heat-cured acrylic, the final samples were subjected to tensile testing on a universal electromechanical testing machine until failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test(α= 0.05).
Results: A statistically significant difference in mean tensile bond strength was observed among the four groups (P < 0.001), with Ivoclar composite showing the highest mean tensile bond strength, followed by Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli. The percentage of adhesive failures in Ivoclar composite, Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli samples was 77.8%, 66.7%, 55.6%, and 77.8%, respectively.
Conclusion: The highest tensile bond strength was observed in Ivoclar composite teeth, followed by Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli.


 
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Prosthodontics
Received: 2025/05/31 | Accepted: 2025/11/1 | Published: 2025/11/28
References
1. Nejati Danesh F, Savabi O, Erfani M. A comparative study of bonding strength between Iranian plastic teeth and Acropars resin base material. Beheshti Univ Dent J. 2003;21(3):415-420 [Persian].
2. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):270-276.
3. Ejlali M. Treatment of patients without teeth: complete denture-1. Tehran: Shayan Nemoodar; 2020.
4. Gharebagh TG, Hamedirad F, Miruzadeh K. Comparison of Bond Strength of Acrylic, Composite, and Nanocomposite Artificial Teeth to Heat-Cure Acrylic Denture Base Resin. Front Dent. 2019;16(3):166-172. [DOI:10.18502/fid.v16i3.1587] [PMID] []
5. Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 14th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019. p. 51-96.
6. Phunthikaphadr T, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Pressure transmission and distribution under impact load using artificial denture teeth made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(5):319-327. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60183-9] [PMID]
7. Rosthamkhani F, Gharehchahi J, Asadollahzadeh M, Zebarjad S, Gharehchahi M. Comparison of Tensile Strength of Four Kind of Acrylic Artificial Teeth to Acrylic Denture Base In Vitro. J Mashhad Dent Sch. 2012;36(2):105-12 [Persian].
8. Mohamed SZ. Evaluation of bond strength between nanohybrid composite teeth and two different denture base materials (comparison study). Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(2):1385-1390. [DOI:10.21608/edj.2021.55772.1437]
9. Özer NE, Oğuz EI. Effect of Repair Material Type and Thermocycling Aging on Repair Bond Strength to Various Artificial. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2023;26(2):150-156. [DOI:10.7126/cumudj.1228510]
10. Baghani MT, Yahyazadehfar N, Zamanian A, Abbasi K, Shanei F, Shidfar S, et al. Factors affecting bonding strength of artificial teeth: A literature review. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2018;6(1):184-191.
11. Schneider RL, Curtis ER, Clancy JM. Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(2):145-150. [DOI:10.1067/mpr.2002.127898] [PMID]
12. Naser Khaki M, Ehsani S. Comparing the bond strength of four kinds of Ideal-Makoo artificial teeth (Iran) and two Leichtenstein & Italy Ivoclar teeth with prosthetic acrylic base. J Dent Sch. 2007;25(3):310-315 [Persian]
13. Ghahramani L, Shahabi S, Amirjan A, Fazel A. Comparison of bond strength of composite and acrylic teeth to heat-cured and auto-polymerized acrylic denture base. Journal of Dental Medicine-Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2010;23(4):215-226 [Persian].
14. Kawara M, Carter JM, Ogle RE, Johnson RR. Bonding of plastic teeth to denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(4):566-571 [DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(91)90525-2] [PMID]
15. Jaber Radha HS, Naji SA., Haddad AI. Assessing Tensile and Shear Bond Strength between Artificial Acrylic Teeth and Nano-Silica Reinforced PMMA Denture Base Material. J Nanostruct, 2024; 14(1):20-37.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nurmohammadi A, Shahtoosi M, Mahabadi M, Delshad E. Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Four Types of Artificial Teeth to Acrylic Denture Base Under In Vitro Conditions. cofs 2025; 3 (4)
URL: http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/article-1-113-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 4 (11-2025) Back to browse issues page
Contemporary Orofacial Science Contemporary Orofacial Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732