<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>contemporary orofacial science</title>
<title_fa>contemporary orofacial science</title_fa>
<short_title>cofs</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn></journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2981-0426</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/cofs</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1404</year>
	<month>8</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2025</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>3</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Four Types of Artificial Teeth to Acrylic Denture Base Under In Vitro Conditions</title>
	<subject_fa>پروتزهای دندانی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Prosthodontics</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span cambria=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Background:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt; Detachment of artificial teeth from the denture acrylic base is a significant complication among denture users. This study aimed to compare the tensile bond strength of four types of artificial teeth to the acrylic denture base.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span cambria=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Materials and Methods:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt; This in vitro experimental study &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;investigated 36 &lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;samples of four types of artificial teeth: Ivoclar composite, Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli. Nine maxillary first premolar teeth from each type were selected. Grooves measuring 3 mm in depth and 2 mm in length were created on the occlusal surface of each tooth, and this surface was embedded in self-cure acrylic up to the CEJ level. The smallest cross-sectional area among the samples was selected as the standard, and all specimens were adjusted to match this area. The primary casts were poured, cylindrical wax models were attached to the specimen bases, and flasking was performed. After replacing the wax with heat-cured acrylic, the final samples were subjected to tensile testing on a universal electromechanical testing machine until failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey&amp;#39;s post hoc test(&amp;alpha;= 0.05).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span cambria=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;: A statistically significant difference in mean tensile bond strength was observed among the four groups (P &lt; 0.001),&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;with Ivoclar composite showing the highest mean tensile bond strength, followed by Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli. The percentage of adhesive failures in Ivoclar composite, Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli samples was 77.8%, 66.7%, 55.6%, and 77.8%, respectively.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span cambria=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:200%&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt; The highest tensile bond strength was observed in Ivoclar composite teeth, followed by Ivoclar porcelain, Yamahachi, and Maroli.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword></keyword>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>7</end_page>
	<web_url>http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-64&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Ali </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Nurmohammadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600970</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600970</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mojtaba </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Shahtoosi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600971</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600971</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Meysam </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mahabadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600972</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600972</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Elham</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Delshad</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600973</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600973</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.C, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
