[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
publication ethics::
Abstracting and Indexing::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2021
Citations1919
h-index22
i10-index00
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 1 (2-2026) ::
cofs 2026, 4(1): 29-35 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of root number and anatomical configuration of maxillary second molar canals using CBCT
Farnoosh Mobininejad , Maryam Zare Jahormi * , Azadeh Torkzadeh , Mohammad Hossein Moarefpour , Zahra Sadat Mohajer Hejazi
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Isf.c, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (25 Views)
Background: The root canal treatment of the maxillary second molar tooth is one of the challenging cases in root canal treatment because it has many anatomical variations. The purpose of this study was to investigate root number and anatomical configuration of maxillary second molar canals using  the Cone Beam Computed Tomography method.
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 165 CBCT images of maxillary second molars from patients aged 18 years or older, available in the archives of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Azad University of Isfahan were used. CBCT images were evaluated in axial, sagittal, and coronal sections at two separate time points with a defined interval, and the data for each tooth were recorded in specially designed forms. The data were analysed by the Chi-square test (α=0.05).
Results: Most of the maxillary second molars had three roots (81.2%). Two roots were observed in 9.7% of teeth, and single-rooted teeth were found in 6.7% of second molars, and 2.4% had four roots. 63.6% of single-rooted teeth had one canal, and 36.4% had two canals. Most of the teeth with two roots had three canals (81.2%), and 18.8% had two canals. 86.6% of teeth with three roots had four canals, and 13.4% had three canals. A C-type configuration was found in a single-rooted tooth with a single canal.
Conclusion: The most common variations were three-rooted and four-canalled teeth. The least anatomical variety of the root and canal was teeth with two roots and two canals. Mesiobuccal roots in three-rooted and four-canal teeth showed the greatest anatomical diversity according to Vertucci’s classification. Only one case of C-type canal was found.

 
Full-Text [PDF 313 kb]   (15 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Endodontics
Received: 2025/01/2 | Accepted: 2025/10/12 | Published: 2026/03/25
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mobininejad F, Zare Jahormi M, Torkzadeh A, Moarefpour M H, Mohajer Hejazi Z S. Evaluation of root number and anatomical configuration of maxillary second molar canals using CBCT. cofs 2026; 4 (1) :29-35
URL: http://cofs.khuisf.ac.ir/article-1-133-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 1 (2-2026) Back to browse issues page
Contemporary Orofacial Science Contemporary Orofacial Science
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741